Cyber Security for Start-ups

When it comes to cyber attacks, there is no such thing as a target being too small. In fact, there are a number of reasons why start-ups may be more likely to be targeted.

Cyber Security for Start-upsCyber Security for Start-ups
Category
Insight | Tech
Insight
|
Tech
Published Date
17
November 2021
Reading Time

Introduction

Our increased online connectivity, the growing number of networked devices and the enhanced sophistication of cyber attacks mean that threats to information security are only growing.

When it comes to cyber attacks, there is no such thing as a target being too small. In fact, there are a number of reasons why start-ups may be more likely to be targeted.

Start-ups often have new intellectual property and trade secrets that could be valuable to third parties. Even the smallest start-ups often store or handle customer data, including financial information. And often start-ups focus on the more pressing parts of the business, such as sales and operations, which means that cyber security often gets overlooked.

Why should start-ups care about cyber security and data privacy?

The disruption to business operations, financial loss, IP / data theft, reputational damage, legal exposure and loss of shareholder value that can result from a cyber security incident mean that every business should proactively address cyber security. Start-ups are no different.  

In addition to being and remaining legally compliant, start-ups that invest upfront in cyber security and data protection can foster a more positive brand image, enhance customer trust and gain a competitive advantage. Investors are also more likely to invest in a start-up where they know that cyber security has been addressed, thereby mitigating the risk of loss of shareholder value.

What are the 3 key areas start-ups need to be aware of in terms of their legal obligations?

Start-ups need to be aware of legal obligations under the Companies Act 1993 and the Privacy Act 2020, and also under the contractual arrangements they have in place with customers, suppliers and other stakeholders, in respect of data privacy and security.  

1) Companies Act 1993 - Section 137

When exercising powers or performing duties as a director, each director must exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a reasonable director would exercise in the same circumstances. This duty of care extends to ensuring the security of data asses.

2) Privacy Act 2020

Every business that collects personal information must have reasonable safeguards in place to ensure the information is kept secure against loss, misuse and unauthorised access or disclosure (IPP5). Where the information is given to a third party in connection with the provision of a service to the business that collected the information, the business must do everything reasonably within its power to prevent unauthorised use or unauthorised disclosure of that information.

If a business has a privacy breach that it believes has caused (or is likely to cause) serious harm (a notifiable privacy breach), it needs to notify the Privacy Commissioner and affected individuals as soon as possible (s114 and 115).

A privacy breach means any unauthorised or accidental access to, or disclosure, alteration, loss, or destruction of, the personal information, and includes any action that prevents the agency from accessing the information on either a temporary or permanent basis.

The Privacy Commissioner is able to issue compliance notices to require a business to do(or stop doing) an act to comply with the Privacy Act. Failure to follow a compliance notice by a specified deadline, or to notify the Privacy Commissioner of a notifiable privacy breach (without reasonable excuse), could result in a fine of up to NZ$10,000.

3) Contractual obligations

Customers, suppliers and other stakeholders may require contractual commitments from start-ups relating to their cyber security and data protection processes and systems, and remedies where start-ups fail to meet those commitments.

What are some of practical tips for protecting information

A reactive response to cyber crime is usually ineffective as the damage done maybe irreparable. While computer based crime can be prosecuted in New Zealand under the Crimes Act 1961 and civil claims may be brought against an attacker, it is not always possible to identity the attackers and enforcement of New Zealand law when the offender in overseas (which is often the case in cyber attacks) is difficult.

Therefore, the best approach to protecting a start-up’s information is to take preventative measures.

While there is no “one size fits all solution”, start-ups should put in place physical, technical and organisational measures that are reasonable in the circumstances to mitigate the risks of cyber security incidents. Start-ups should also develop a security incident response plan taking into account the nature of the information that they collect and hold, and the harm that could be caused if such information was lost, stolen, or used or accessed in an unauthorised manner.

What should a start-up do if it suffers a security breach?

Where a start-up suffers a cyber security incident, it should immediately assess the situation and respond appropriately. Where a security incident response plan is in place,the plan should be followed.  

The start-up should first take any necessary steps to retrieve and secure stolen information and limit any damage caused. In parallel, the start-up will need to consider who needs to be informed and when,bearing in mind its legal obligations under the Privacy Act 2020 and its contractual arrangements. The start-up may need to bring on professional support in the way of IT experts, lawyers,and PR advisors.  

Once the cyber security incident has been adequately addressed, the start-up should undertake a thorough investigation of the cause of the breach and update its policies and procedures as required to ensure the risk of the breach occurring again is mitigated.

Conclusion

Cyber attacks are increasing in frequency, sophistication and impact. The disruption and loss that can result from a cyber security incident mean that start-ups cannot afford to wait to get hacked before doing something about cyber security.  

While there is not a “one size fits all” solution to cyber security, a crucial first step for start-ups is understanding the nature of the data they hold and the legal obligations that attach to that data.  Once start-ups understand this, they can develop and implement reasonable measures and plans that will help prevent, and mitigate the impact of, any cyber security incident.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight

Palmer v Alalääkkölä

Other articles you
might like

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
2
April 2026

Negotiating a fintech partnership agreement is not a zero sum game.

Andrew Dentice

Partner

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
1
April 2026

New rule 3A means individuals must be notified about indirect collection under the Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025.

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge

Anchali Anandanayagam

Partner

Open banking launches in New Zealand
2
December 2025

The official commencement of open banking in New Zealand is a significant milestone for the local industry.

Andrew Dentice

Partner

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge