The long and winding road to royalties
In good news for visual artists, an artist resale royalty scheme is now on the legislative horizon.

For many New Zealand artists, the visual art market is an unforgiving place. However, perhaps unexpectedly, things are looking up following the introduction of the New Zealand and United Kingdom Fair Trade Agreement. In good news for artists, this agreement was the impetus to finally implement an artist resale royalty scheme (ARR).
The ARR aims to ensure visual artists are recognised and rewarded when their works are resold on the secondary art market.
The Resale Right for Visual Artists Bill (Bill), which will introduce the ARR, has now unanimously passed its third reading and only needs the Royal assent to become law.
So, what does the Bill do and what does the ARR mean for intellectual property rights?
What is the ARR?
Broadly, the ARR provides a framework for visual artists to continue to receive royalties when their work is sold in the secondary market (that is, in a resale after the initial sale by the artist). This is a similar concept to musical artists receiving royalties when their songs are replayed. The aim is to better compensate artists for their work, particularly where it increases in value over time, and to create more opportunity for artists to follow their passion as a career.
New Zealand has lagged behind in this space, but the ARR will bring New Zealand in line with around 80 other countries with similar resale frameworks. An additional benefit is that where those other countries have reciprocal schemes, eligible sales of New Zealand art in those countries will see Kiwi artists benefit, even when their art is sold offshore.
What do we know about the ARR?
• Any ‘eligible artist’ (or their estate) will receive a royalty payment when their art is resold on the secondary art market. This right can’t be waived or transferred.
• There will be a flat rate royalty of five percent of the resale value (before any additions, deductions or charges).
• The ARR will be managed through an independent, not-for-profit collecting agency. The agency will deduct a twenty percent fee from the five percent royalty to cover administration costs of collecting and redistributing royalties.
• The royalty will usually be paid by the seller and their agent, but buyers and buyers’ agents could also be liable to pay the royalty.
• The resale right automatically applies to all ‘professional resales’ i.e., sales involving art market professionals (e.g., art galleries, dealers, consultants and auctioneers), or sales by publicly funded museums, galleries, libraries and archives.
• Parties to private resales can opt in as ‘voluntary qualifying resales’. The aim is to help Māori, Pacific and female artists, whose work is more frequently resold privately.
• The collecting agency or the artist can bring proceedings to collect unpaid royalties.
• The resale right has the same lifespan as copyright. However, unlike copyright, the resale right is inalienable, meaning it cannot be transferred or waived.
• The resale right will be provided on a reciprocal basis with corresponding regimes overseas.
Who and what qualifies for the ARR?
There are four conditions to be met to qualify for the ARR.
1. The work needs to be an original visual artwork. This includes where an artist has made a limited number of copies, and art created using computers or electronic devices, but does not include buildings, dramatic works, musical works, or literary works (as defined in the Copyright Act 1994).
2. It must be a 'Qualifying Resale’, so a New Zealand-based Art Market Professional must be involved and the resale value must meet the minimum threshold price of NZ$1,000).
3. It needs to be a current right. The right generally aligns with the term of copyright, 50 years past the death of the artist (so that successors may benefit too). Works created before the ARR is implemented are eligible but the scheme is not retrospective, so sales occurring before the ARR comes into force will not qualify.
4. The artist must be an ‘Eligible Artist’ i.e., a citizen or resident of New Zealand or a country providing reciprocal rights. The same eligibility requirements are applied to the artist's successor.
What does this mean for copyright owners - will artists still receive a resale royalty?
Yes. The ‘resale right’ is a related but separate right to copyright, a little like ‘moral rights’.
The owner of copyright in an artwork can sell or licence the copyright, usually for a fee. The artist will be the ‘first’ owner of copyright for their own work, and so unless they agree that the copyright will be owned by someone else, or the artwork has been ‘commissioned’, the artist will be the copyright owner. The copyright owner can decide the terms of any licence for the artwork, which can include restrictions on its use.
The ARR will operate independently of copyright and licensing. This means that artists will be entitled to royalties under the ARR regardless of whether they own or have licensed copyright in the work. So, provided an artist doesn’t transfer copyright, they could sell their work to one party, while continuing to license it to others, and then profit again when the work is resold (and resold, and resold…).
What’s the big deal?
The ARR aims to support Aotearoa artists missing out on some of the benefit of the potentially large sums in the secondary market. For example, Bill Hammond’s estate would have been entitled to around $25,000 from the sale of “Hokey Pokey 3” on 15 August, had the ARR been in force.
The ARR will be operational by the end of 2024, bringing New Zealand visual artists to the end of a long and winding road to receiving royalties in the secondary market. This appears to be a very positive step.
If you have questions about how this could impact you or your business, we’re happy to discuss how the ARR could matter to you.
Services in this insight
Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
Other articles you
might like
The Broadcasting Standards Authority has concluded it has jurisdiction over an online media outlet that livestreams to New Zealand audiences.
The new Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code tightens expectations on health and therapeutic claims, especially in digital advertising.
A new Members' bill would ban some social media for users under 16 years old.
.jpg)











.jpg)

.jpg)
